Effective social posting.......... - Thirty Day Challenge Forums:
Maverick7
Member
Caro, What I am trying to understand is: If I create a blogspot site on speed reading, my next step is to socially post it to digg, stumble, reddit, bluedot, etc. Then will I make new content on blogspot to socially post it again? And if so, would I submit the new post onto the same sites (ie digg, stumble, reddit, bluedot, etc.?)
Maverick7
Member
Caro, What I am trying to understand is: If I create a blogspot site on speed reading, my next step is to socially post it to digg, stumble, reddit, bluedot, etc. Then will I make new content on blogspot to socially post it again? And if so, would I submit the new post onto the same sites (ie digg, stumble, reddit, bluedot, etc.?)
So post #1 to digg: 'Great blog on sausage making tips' then I update the blog (or do I not and just start to do another content holder?) with new content.
So post #2 to digg: "This sausage making site just showed the latest recipes that include sausage making."Hope I am making sense here. What I am asking is can we post to the same web 2.0 sites the same "content holders" but just letting them know it has new info or do we just move to the next site?I don't want the sites to think I am spamming. If they see my username submitting the same "content holders", I may raise a red flag.
Caro
Moderator
Again using your specific example this time:You have a blogspot blog.You post once.You yourself del-icio-us & stumble your blog - your team mates can do this too if they want:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/&http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/firstarticle.....You would then Digg, Reddit, Netscape - only social networks that are appropriate:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/firstarticle..... (as opposed to the blog itself)Your team-mates could if they want give you thumbs up, votes etcThen you would do as above for:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/secondarticle.....and http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/thirdarticle.....If you are using a true blog platform - like blogger or wordpress.For the static platforms - like tumblr, squidoo, hub and others - you just do it the once.You see for a blogger blog or WP (and other true blogs) each new post has it's own url. So you retrieve that and social post as I have described previously.
So post #2 to digg: "This sausage making site just showed the latest recipes that include sausage making."Hope I am making sense here. What I am asking is can we post to the same web 2.0 sites the same "content holders" but just letting them know it has new info or do we just move to the next site?I don't want the sites to think I am spamming. If they see my username submitting the same "content holders", I may raise a red flag.
Caro
Moderator
Again using your specific example this time:You have a blogspot blog.You post once.You yourself del-icio-us & stumble your blog - your team mates can do this too if they want:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/&http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/firstarticle.....You would then Digg, Reddit, Netscape - only social networks that are appropriate:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/firstarticle..... (as opposed to the blog itself)Your team-mates could if they want give you thumbs up, votes etcThen you would do as above for:http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/secondarticle.....and http://georgesblog.blogspot.com/thirdarticle.....If you are using a true blog platform - like blogger or wordpress.For the static platforms - like tumblr, squidoo, hub and others - you just do it the once.You see for a blogger blog or WP (and other true blogs) each new post has it's own url. So you retrieve that and social post as I have described previously.